Natalizumab biosimilars

An antibody for relapsing multiple sclerosis, with a single biosimilar, Tyruko, approved in the United States and Europe in 2023.

Reference product Tysabri (Biogen) · Monoclonal antibody · Target Alpha-4 integrin · ATC L04AG03 · Neurology
FDAproducts approved1
EMAproducts authorised1
MHRAproducts licensed in the UK1
PMDAproducts approved in Japan0
HCproducts approved in Canada0
CDSCOpermissions0
EDEregistered in the UAE0

About natalizumab

What it is

Natalizumab is an antibody that stops immune cells crossing from the blood into the brain and spinal cord. It is one of the most effective treatments for relapsing multiple sclerosis, and in the United States it is also used in Crohn's disease.

How it works

It blocks a molecule on the surface of immune cells that they need to stick to blood vessel walls and cross into tissue. With the crossing blocked, the attacks on nerve fibres that cause relapses become rare.

How it is given

An infusion into a vein every four weeks, under a monitoring programme, because the same action carries a rare risk of a serious brain infection.

What it treats

Relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis and, in the United States, Crohn's disease.

How a biosimilar is compared

Immune reactions to natalizumab are more common than with most biologics and can cause loss of effect, so comparing them is central. A clinical comparison is done in people with multiple sclerosis by counting new lesions on brain scans over six months.

The reference product

The reference product is Tysabri, from Biogen. It was briefly withdrawn soon after its launch because of the brain infection risk and returned under a monitoring programme that still applies today.

Why it matters for biosimilar developers

Natalizumab shows a biosimilar entering a market defined by a safety programme rather than by price. The biosimilar must fit the same monitoring as the original, and its launch depended on a companion blood test. One developer has done it. There is no Indian or Gulf biosimilar.

Clinical details are summarised from the reference product's prescribing information. Approval dates, numbers and presentations are in the tables below, each with its source.

Competitive outlook

Current market intelligenceRef: ClinicalTrials.gov
0
In pharmacokinetic trials
none found
0
In efficacy trials
none found
0
Under regulatory review
none listed
1
Approved somewhere in the seven markets
  • Todayone natalizumab biosimilar is approved in at least one of the seven markets.
  • AheadNo further candidate is visible in comparative trials or under review, so the competitive set is the approved products in the register below.

No published switching study for this molecule yet.

Approvals by year

20132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026FDATyruko (2023)EMATyruko (2023)MHRAPMDAHCCDSCOEDE
FDAAug 2023Tyruko
EMASep 2023Tyruko
MHRAnonenot listed
PMDAnonenot listed
HCnonenot listed
CDSCOnonenot listed
EDEnonenot listed

Regulatory register

RegulatorBrandHolder or applicantApprovedApplication or permissionUS licenceStatusSource
FDATyrukoSandoz Inc.Aug 2023761322BiosimilarApprovedS001, S016
EMATyrukoSandoz GmbHSep 2023EMEA/H/C/005752ApprovedS017
MHRATyrukoNot shown in the MHRA substance listnot shownnot publishedApprovedS023

Last checked Sep 2026. US interchangeability designations are listed in full on the interchangeable biosimilars page. CDSCO lists permissions by firm and INN, not brand. PMDA's list and the UAE directory do not publish application numbers; Canadian dates are the first approval or market date recorded in the Drug Product Database.

Regulatory pathway by market

Requirements for a natalizumab biosimilar under the guidance in force in September 2026.

FDA, United StatesEMA, European UnionMHRA, United KingdomPMDA, JapanHealth CanadaCDSCO, IndiaEDE, UAE
Legal pathwaySection 351(k) of the Public Health Service Act (BPCIA 2009)Article 10(4) of Directive 2001/83/EC; centralised procedure is mandatory for biotechnology productsUK marketing authorisation from MHRA. EU approvals in force at the end of 2020 became Great Britain licences automatically; new products since 2021 are approved through reliance on EMA or FDA decisions, and from 2024 through the International Recognition Procedure. Northern Ireland follows EU licencesMHLW approval on PMDA review under the Guideline for Ensuring Quality, Safety and Efficacy of Biosimilars (2009, revised 2020), with Q&A updates in 2024 and 2026Notice of Compliance under the Food and Drug Regulations as a biosimilar biologic drug, assessed under Health Canada's guidance on biosimilars (2016, revised 2022 and 2026)Guidelines on Similar Biologics (CDSCO and DBT, 2016, in force); revised draft published May 2025Registration through the Emirates Drug Establishment; the public directory does not distinguish biosimilars from other biologicals
Reference productUS-licensed reference; a non-US comparator may be used with analytical and PK bridgingEU-authorised reference; a non-EEA comparator may be used with bridging dataReference biologic authorised in the UK, or an EU-authorised version with bridging dataThe original biopharmaceutical approved in Japan; foreign-sourced reference accepted with bridging since the 2020 revisionReference biologic drug authorised in Canada, or a non-Canadian version of it with bridging dataProduct licensed in India, or if not, one licensed in an ICH country, with justificationNot stated in the public directory; registration relies on assessment by reference regulators
Comparative clinical studyDraft guidance (October 2025): comparative analytical assessment plus a PK similarity study and immunogenicity assessment; a comparative efficacy study is generally not neededReflection paper adopted March 2026: a comparative efficacy trial can be waived when analytical and PK comparability is sufficientFollows the EU guideline; MHRA's 2021 biosimilar guidance states that a comparative efficacy trial is generally not needed where analytical and pharmacokinetic comparability is shownComparative PK study and, in principle, a comparative efficacy study; the May 2026 early consideration sets out when the efficacy study can be omitted, and Japanese patient data are no longer required in every case (2025)Comparative structural and functional studies, PK and, where warranted, PD equivalence; the 2026 revision reduces the expectation of comparative efficacy trials in line with FDA and EMAComparative PK/PD study and a comparative safety and efficacy study are generally expected, followed by a post-marketing studyAssessed on the dossier accepted by the reference regulator
InterchangeabilityA separate designation permitting pharmacy-level substitution; switching studies generally not required under the June 2024 draftEMA and HMA statement (September 2022): EU biosimilars are interchangeable with their reference; substitution rules are set by each member stateNo designation; MHRA considers approved biosimilars interchangeable with their reference, and switching is decided by the prescriber and by NHS commissioningNot defined; prescribing by brand, with pharmacist substitution not automaticNo federal designation; substitution and mandatory switching policies are set by each province, several of which have required switching since 2019Not defined in the guidelinesNot defined
NamingINN plus a four-letter suffixINN, identical to the reference; brand name and batch recorded for pharmacovigilanceBrand name with the non-proprietary name; licence numbers PL, PLGB or PLNIINN followed by BS (biosimilar), strength, form and the company name in quotation marks, with a biosimilar number in the non-proprietary nameNon-proprietary name identical to the reference, with brand name and DIN as identifiersINN with the brand nameBrand name as registered

Sources: FDA draft guidance on comparative efficacy studies (October 2025) and interchangeability (June 2024); EMA reflection paper EMA/CHMP/BMWP/60916/2025 (March 2026) and EMA/HMA statement on interchangeability (September 2022); CDSCO Guidelines on Similar Biologics 2016 and 2025 draft (S009, S010); EDE directory (S018); MHLW/PMDA biosimilar guideline and notifications (S021); Health Canada guidance on biosimilar biologic drugs; MHRA guidance on the licensing of biosimilar products (2021).

EvySaif prepares the comparative evidence plan and the regional dossier strategy for natalizumab programmes. Regulatory strategy consulting

Presentations and concentration

A single biosimilar presentation, 300 mg in 15 mL (20 mg/mL) concentrate for infusion. The 150 mg subcutaneous syringe exists only for the reference product.

ProductFDAEMAMHRAPMDAHCCDSCOEDE
Tyruko PB006
300 mg/15 mL vial
see SmPC
300 mg vial
····

EU presentations are listed in each product's SmPC.

Developers by market

DeveloperProductFDAEMAMHRAPMDAHCCDSCOEDE
Polpharma BiologicsTyruko✓✓✓····

Entering a market where a competitor is already listed changes the evidence and pricing conversation. EvySaif's global value dossier and HTA submission work covers that side.

Products

In development

ClinicalTrials.gov holds one comparative trial of one natalizumab biosimilar candidate against the reference product, run by one sponsor. Every candidate in these trials already has an approval in at least one of the seven markets. Trials are listed with the sponsor's own wording for status and dates.

CandidateDeveloper or sponsorReference productPhaseDesignRegistry statusStartedPrimary completionIn the AtlasRegistry record
PB006Polpharma BiologicsTysabriPhase 3Comparative efficacyCompletedOct 2019Aug 2021TyrukoNCT04115488

Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov, entered by the sponsors and not verified by any regulator. Status and dates are as posted; sponsors often update them late. Trials registered only on other registries, such as India's CTRI or China's ChiCTR, are not included. Checked 12 Sep 2026. The full list across all molecules is on the pipeline page.

Questions

Which is the natalizumab biosimilar?

Tyruko, developed by Polpharma and sold by Sandoz, approved in the United States in August 2023 and in Europe a month later.

Is Tyruko interchangeable in the United States?

No.

Is there a natalizumab biosimilar in India or the UAE?

No. India's only entry is the originator's import permission, and only Tysabri is registered in the UAE.

Does the biosimilar carry the same safety programme?

Yes. It is prescribed under the same virus testing and monitoring as Tysabri in both the United States and Europe.

How is a natalizumab biosimilar tested?

Laboratory comparison, a study of how the drug behaves in the body, comparison of immune reactions, and a clinical study counting new lesions on brain scans in people with multiple sclerosis.

Why is there only one natalizumab biosimilar?

The safety programme, the monitoring blood test and the clinical study make it a demanding programme for a market smaller than the anti-TNF antibodies.

Work with EvySaif on natalizumab

Natalizumab biosimilar landscape report

The register on this page as a delivered document: every approval, holder, presentation and pathway requirement across FDA, EMA, CDSCO and the Gulf, updated to the month, with the sources attached.

Request the landscape report

Regulatory gap assessment

For a developer deciding whether and where to file: a review of your analytical, PK and clinical package against what each regulator expects for natalizumab, with the gaps ranked and a filing sequence recommended.

About the gap assessment

Sources

Planning natalizumab biosimilar development?

EvySaif can help assess your regulatory pathway, clinical evidence requirements and market-entry strategy across India, UAE and other target markets.

Talk to a biosimilar regulatory consultant
Data current to September 2026.