Epoetin alfa and zeta biosimilars
Recombinant erythropoietin for anaemia of kidney disease and chemotherapy, the first therapeutic protein to attract biosimilars in Europe and one of the most-manufactured biologics in India.
About epoetin alfa and zeta
Recombinant human erythropoietin, a 165-amino-acid glycoprotein of about 30 kDa with three N-linked and one O-linked glycan, produced in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Epoetin alfa and epoetin zeta share the amino acid sequence and differ only in glycosylation profile, which is why the EU gave the Stada and Hospira product its own INN.
Binds the erythropoietin receptor on erythroid progenitors in the marrow, stimulating their proliferation and differentiation into red cells. The sialic acid content of its glycans determines its half-life and therefore its potency in vivo, which is why glycosylation is the critical quality attribute in every comparability exercise.
Subcutaneous bioavailability about 20 to 40%, peak concentrations at 12 to 18 hours and a half-life of about 24 hours subcutaneously and 4 to 13 hours intravenously. Dosing is one to three times weekly, titrated to haemoglobin.
50 to 150 IU/kg one to three times weekly, adjusted to a haemoglobin target, in pre-filled syringes and vials from 1,000 to 40,000 IU. The unit system and the target-haemoglobin restrictions introduced after cardiovascular safety findings are common to all products.
- Anaemia of chronic kidney disease, in dialysis and pre-dialysis patients
- Chemotherapy-induced anaemia in non-myeloid malignancies
- Reduction of allogeneic transfusion in elective surgery
- Anaemia of prematurity (EU) and of HIV treatment with zidovudine (United States)
Antibodies to epoetin can neutralise endogenous erythropoietin and cause pure red cell aplasia, a rare but serious event that shaped biosimilar requirements: the EU asked for immunogenicity data in the subcutaneous route in renal patients before allowing it. Comparative programmes use analytical similarity with emphasis on glycosylation, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in healthy volunteers using reticulocyte and haemoglobin response, and comparative efficacy in renal anaemia by both routes.
Epogen was licensed by FDA on 1 June 1989 (BLA 103234), with Procrit as the same product under a different name; Eprex was approved nationally in EU member states from 1988 and has no centralised number. Sandoz's Binocrit, with the Hexal and Medice brands, became the first EU epoetin biosimilar in August 2007, and Stada's Silapo and Hospira's Retacrit, as epoetin zeta, followed in December 2007. Retacrit reached the US in May 2018. India's first epoetins, from Wockhardt (2001) and Intas and Shantha (2005), predate the published CDSCO lists.
Sources: Purple Book (S016), EMA medicines data (S017), CDSCO lists (S011 to S014); Indian launch history from company and press reports.
Epoetin is where biosimilar regulation was invented: the first EU biosimilar guidelines were written around it, and the pure red cell aplasia episode with a reformulated Eprex in 2002 taught every regulator that small process changes matter. It is also the deepest Indian segment in this register, with more than a dozen firms holding manufacturing or import permissions, and Binocrit is registered in the UAE alongside Eprex.
Sources: Binocrit and Retacrit summaries of product characteristics (EMA) and Epogen and Retacrit US prescribing information (FDA).
Approvals by year
Regulatory register
| Regulator | Brand | Holder or applicant | Approved | Application or permission | US licence | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDA | Retacrit | Hospira Inc., a Pfizer Company | May 2018 | 125545 | Biosimilar | Approved | S001, S016 |
| EMA | Epoetin alfa Hexal | Hexal AG | Aug 2007 | EMEA/H/C/000726 | Approved | S017 | |
| EMA | Abseamed | Medice Arzneimittel Pütter GmbH Co. KG | Aug 2007 | EMEA/H/C/000727 | Approved | S017 | |
| EMA | Binocrit | Sandoz GmbH | Aug 2007 | EMEA/H/C/000725 | Approved | S017 | |
| EMA | Silapo | Stada Arzneimittel AG | Dec 2007 | EMEA/H/C/000760 | Approved | S017 | |
| EMA | Retacrit | Pfizer Europe MA EEIG | Dec 2007 | EMEA/H/C/000872 | Approved | S017 | |
| PMDA | Epoetin Alfa BS [JCR] | JCR Pharmaceuticals | Jan 2010 | not published | Approved | S020 | |
| CDSCO | Biocon (INN only) | Biocon Limited | Aug 2006 | Import permission | Approved | S013 | |
| CDSCO | Reliance Biopharmaceuticals (INN only) | Reliance Biopharmaceuticals | Jan 2008 | Import permission | Approved | S013 | |
| CDSCO | Cadila Healthcare (INN only) | Cadila Healthcare Ltd | Apr 2010 | MF-406/10 | Approved | S014 | |
| CDSCO | Bioviz Technologies (INN only) | Bioviz Technologies Pvt Ltd | Aug 2011 | MF-333/11 | Approved | S014 | |
| CDSCO | Lupin (INN only) | Lupin Limited | Aug 2011 | Import permission | Approved | S013 | |
| CDSCO | Cipla (INN only) | Cipla Limited | Nov 2021 | IMP/BIO/21/000096 | Approved | S012 | |
| CDSCO | Wockhardt (INN only) | Wockhardt Limited | Feb 2023 | MF/BIO/23/000006 | Approved | S011 | |
| EDE | Binocrit | Sandoz GmbH TechOps, Austria | Sep 2018 | not published | Registered | S018 |
CDSCO lists permissions by firm and INN, not brand. PMDA's list and the UAE directory do not publish application numbers; Canadian dates are the first approval or market date recorded in the Drug Product Database.
Regulatory pathway by market
Requirements for an epoetin alfa and zeta biosimilar under the guidance in force in September 2026.
| FDA, United States | EMA, European Union | PMDA, Japan | Health Canada | CDSCO, India | EDE, UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legal pathway | Section 351(k) of the Public Health Service Act (BPCIA 2009) | Article 10(4) of Directive 2001/83/EC; centralised procedure is mandatory for biotechnology products | MHLW approval on PMDA review under the Guideline for Ensuring Quality, Safety and Efficacy of Biosimilars (2009, revised 2020), with Q&A updates in 2024 and 2026 | Notice of Compliance under the Food and Drug Regulations as a biosimilar biologic drug, assessed under Health Canada's guidance on biosimilars (2016, revised 2022 and 2026) | Guidelines on Similar Biologics (CDSCO and DBT, 2016, in force); revised draft published May 2025 | Registration through the Emirates Drug Establishment; the public directory does not distinguish biosimilars from other biologicals |
| Reference product | US-licensed reference; a non-US comparator may be used with analytical and PK bridging | EU-authorised reference; a non-EEA comparator may be used with bridging data | The original biopharmaceutical approved in Japan; foreign-sourced reference accepted with bridging since the 2020 revision | Reference biologic drug authorised in Canada, or a non-Canadian version of it with bridging data | Product licensed in India, or if not, one licensed in an ICH country, with justification | Not stated in the public directory; registration relies on assessment by reference regulators |
| Comparative clinical study | Draft guidance (October 2025): comparative analytical assessment plus a PK similarity study and immunogenicity assessment; a comparative efficacy study is generally not needed | Reflection paper adopted March 2026: a comparative efficacy trial can be waived when analytical and PK comparability is sufficient | Comparative PK study and, in principle, a comparative efficacy study; the May 2026 early consideration sets out when the efficacy study can be omitted, and Japanese patient data are no longer required in every case (2025) | Comparative structural and functional studies, PK and, where warranted, PD equivalence; the 2026 revision reduces the expectation of comparative efficacy trials in line with FDA and EMA | Comparative PK/PD study and a comparative safety and efficacy study are generally expected, followed by a post-marketing study | Assessed on the dossier accepted by the reference regulator |
| Interchangeability | A separate designation permitting pharmacy-level substitution; switching studies generally not required under the June 2024 draft | EMA and HMA statement (September 2022): EU biosimilars are interchangeable with their reference; substitution rules are set by each member state | Not defined; prescribing by brand, with pharmacist substitution not automatic | No federal designation; substitution and mandatory switching policies are set by each province, several of which have required switching since 2019 | Not defined in the guidelines | Not defined |
| Naming | INN plus a four-letter suffix | INN, identical to the reference; brand name and batch recorded for pharmacovigilance | INN followed by BS (biosimilar), strength, form and the company name in quotation marks, with a biosimilar number in the non-proprietary name | Non-proprietary name identical to the reference, with brand name and DIN as identifiers | INN with the brand name | Brand name as registered |
Sources: FDA draft guidance on comparative efficacy studies (October 2025) and interchangeability (June 2024); EMA reflection paper EMA/CHMP/BMWP/60916/2025 (March 2026) and EMA/HMA statement on interchangeability (September 2022); CDSCO Guidelines on Similar Biologics 2016 and 2025 draft (S009, S010); EDE directory (S018); MHLW/PMDA biosimilar guideline and notifications (S021); Health Canada guidance on biosimilar biologic drugs.
EvySaif prepares the comparative evidence plan and the regional dossier strategy for epoetin alfa and zeta programmes. Regulatory strategy consulting
Presentations and concentration
Pre-filled syringes and vials from 1,000 IU to 40,000 IU. Epoetin alfa (Binocrit family) and epoetin zeta (Silapo, Retacrit) are the same protein with different glycosylation and are not interchangeable by INN.
| Product | FDA | EMA | PMDA | HC | CDSCO | EDE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binocrit / Epoetin alfa Hexal / Abseamed HX575 | · | see SmPC | · | · | · | 1,000 IU/0.5 mL to 40,000 IU/mL PFS |
| Retacrit / Silapo | 2,000 to 40,000 units/mL vials | see SmPC | · | · | · | · |
| Zydus epoetin | · | · | · | · | Lyophilised injection | · |
| Bioviz epoetin | · | · | · | · | 2,000 and 4,000 IU/mL PFS | · |
| Wockhardt epoetin | · | · | · | · | Injection | · |
| Biocon epoetin | · | · | · | · | 2,000, 4,000 and 10,000 IU vials | · |
| Reliance epoetin | · | · | · | · | 10,000 IU/mL PFS | · |
| Lupin epoetin | · | · | · | · | 2,000 to 10,000 IU PFS | · |
| Cipla epoetin | · | · | · | · | Vials and PFS | · |
| Epoetin Alfa BS JCR | · | · | 750, 1,500 and 3,000 IU syringes | · | · | · |
Sources: Purple Book (S016), PMDA list (S020), Health Canada Drug Product Database (S022), CDSCO permission lists (S011 to S014), EDE directory (S018). EU presentations are listed in each product's SmPC.
Developers by market
| Developer | Product | FDA | EMA | PMDA | HC | CDSCO | EDE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandoz | Binocrit / Epoetin alfa Hexal / Abseamed | · | ✓ | · | · | · | ✓ |
| Norbitec (Stada and Hospira) | Retacrit / Silapo | ✓ | ✓ | · | · | · | · |
| Cadila Healthcare (Zydus Lifesciences) | Zydus epoetin | · | · | · | · | ✓ | · |
| Bioviz Technologies | Bioviz epoetin | · | · | · | · | ✓ | · |
| Wockhardt | Wockhardt epoetin | · | · | · | · | ✓ | · |
| Not stated in the CDSCO list | Biocon epoetin | · | · | · | · | ✓ | · |
| Not stated in the CDSCO list | Reliance epoetin | · | · | · | · | ✓ | · |
| Not stated in the CDSCO list | Lupin epoetin | · | · | · | · | ✓ | · |
| Not stated in the CDSCO list | Cipla epoetin | · | · | · | · | ✓ | · |
| JCR Pharmaceuticals | Epoetin Alfa BS JCR | · | · | ✓ | · | · | · |
Entering a market where a competitor is already listed changes the evidence and pricing conversation. EvySaif's global value dossier and HTA submission work covers that side.
Products
Binocrit / Epoetin alfa Hexal / Abseamed
Retacrit / Silapo
Zydus epoetin
Bioviz epoetin
Wockhardt epoetin
Biocon epoetin
Reliance epoetin
Lupin epoetin
Cipla epoetin
Epoetin Alfa BS JCR
Questions
How many epoetin biosimilars has FDA approved?
One: Retacrit, epoetin alfa-epbx from Pfizer's Hospira, approved on 15 May 2018. It is not designated interchangeable.
Which epoetin biosimilars are authorised in the European Union?
Five brands of two products: Binocrit, Epoetin alfa Hexal and Abseamed (Sandoz's epoetin alfa, August 2007, the first), and Silapo and Retacrit (epoetin zeta, December 2007). A Reliance GeneMedix application, Epostim, was withdrawn.
Is there an epoetin biosimilar approved in India?
Many. CDSCO's published lists show domestic manufacturing permissions to Cadila Healthcare (2010), Bioviz (2011) and Wockhardt (2023), and import permissions to Biocon, Reliance Biopharmaceuticals, Lupin, Cipla and others since 2006. The earliest Indian products, from Wockhardt, Intas and Shantha, predate the lists.
Which epoetin biosimilars are registered in the UAE?
Binocrit, from Sandoz's Austrian site, registered in September 2018 in six strengths, alongside Eprex.
What is the difference between epoetin alfa and epoetin zeta?
Nothing in the amino acid sequence; the EU assigned epoetin zeta as a separate INN to the Stada and Hospira product because its glycosylation profile differs from Eprex. In the United States the same product is epoetin alfa-epbx.
What comparative evidence do regulators expect for epoetin?
Analytical comparability with emphasis on glycosylation and sialylation, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic equivalence in healthy volunteers, comparative efficacy in renal anaemia by both the intravenous and subcutaneous routes, and immunogenicity follow-up for pure red cell aplasia.
Work with EvySaif on epoetin alfa and zeta
Epoetin alfa and zeta biosimilar landscape report
The register on this page as a delivered document: every approval, holder, presentation and pathway requirement across FDA, EMA, CDSCO and the Gulf, updated to the month, with the sources attached.
Request the landscape reportRegulatory gap assessment
For a developer deciding whether and where to file: a review of your analytical, PK and clinical package against what each regulator expects for epoetin alfa and zeta, with the gaps ranked and a filing sequence recommended.
About the gap assessmentSources
S001FDA, Biosimilar Product Information (approved biosimilars table) Primary (regulator)S016FDA Purple Book, monthly data downloads January to August 2026 Primary (regulator)S017EMA, medicines data table (medicines-output-medicines-report_en.xlsx) Primary (regulator)S013CDSCO, import and market permissions till 2019 (r-DNA) Primary (regulator)S014CDSCO, permissions granted in Form 46 and 46A, to 2019 Primary (regulator)S012CDSCO, new drugs (r-DNA origin) approved for import and marketing, Jan 2020 to June 2026 (CT-18) Primary (regulator)S011CDSCO, new drugs (r-DNA origin) approved for manufacture and marketing, Jan 2020 to June 2026 (CT-21) Primary (regulator)S018UAE Emirates Drug Establishment, registered medical product directory Primary (regulator)S020PMDA, list of approved biosimilar products in Japan (as of July 2026) Primary (regulator)S009CDSCO and DBT, Guidelines on Similar Biologics 2016 Primary (regulator)S010CDSCO, Draft Guidelines on Similar Biologics 2025 Primary (regulator)
Planning epoetin alfa and zeta biosimilar development?
EvySaif can help assess your regulatory pathway, clinical evidence requirements and market-entry strategy across India, UAE and other target markets.
Talk to a biosimilar regulatory consultant