Enoxaparin sodium biosimilars
Low-molecular-weight heparin for thrombosis prevention and treatment, treated as a biosimilar in the European Union and the UAE and as a generic drug in the United States and India.
About enoxaparin sodium
A low-molecular-weight heparin produced by alkaline depolymerisation of porcine intestinal mucosal heparin, a mixture of sulphated polysaccharide chains averaging about 4.5 kDa with a characteristic 1,6-anhydro end group on part of the chains. It is not a recombinant protein, which is why the United States treats it as a drug.
Binds antithrombin through a specific pentasaccharide sequence and accelerates its inhibition of factor Xa, with less effect on thrombin than unfractionated heparin, giving an anti-Xa to anti-IIa ratio of about four to one and a more predictable anticoagulant response.
Subcutaneous bioavailability of anti-Xa activity about 90%, peak activity at three to five hours and an elimination half-life of about four to five hours, mainly renal, so dose adjustment is needed in severe kidney impairment.
20 mg or 40 mg once daily for thromboprophylaxis; 1 mg/kg twice daily or 1.5 mg/kg once daily for treatment, in pre-filled syringes from 20 mg (2,000 IU) to 150 mg (15,000 IU). Dosing is expressed in mg or anti-Xa international units.
- Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in surgical and medical patients
- Treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
- Unstable angina and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction
- ST-elevation myocardial infarction
- Prevention of clotting in the extracorporeal circuit during haemodialysis
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, an antibody-mediated reaction to heparin-platelet factor 4 complexes, is the immunological concern for all heparins. In the EU, comparative programmes for enoxaparin rely on analytical characterisation of the polysaccharide chains, pharmacodynamic equivalence of anti-Xa and anti-IIa activity in healthy volunteers, and an immunogenicity assessment; a comparative efficacy study has not been required. In the United States, generics established sameness through five criteria set by FDA in 2010.
Lovenox was approved by FDA on 29 March 1993 (NDA 020164) and Clexane nationally in EU member states from the 1980s; neither has an EMA product number. Because it is derived from animal tissue rather than produced by recombinant DNA, the United States regulates it as a drug and the first generic, from Sandoz, was approved by ANDA in July 2010. The EU treats it as a biological medicine: Inhixa from Techdow and Thorinane from Pharmathen were authorised as biosimilars in September 2016, and Thorinane's authorisation lapsed in 2019. In India, enoxaparin is licensed under the drug rules and does not appear in the r-DNA lists.
Sources: EMA medicines data (S017), EDE directory (S018); US regulatory history from FDA records and press reports.
Enoxaparin is the odd one in the Atlas and it earns its place for that reason: the same product is a biosimilar in Europe and a generic in the United States and India, and the dossier differs accordingly. Chinese heparin manufacturers dominate the supply chain, Techdow's Inhixa is registered in the UAE, and a second EU-sourced product, Ledraxen, reached the UAE in 2021. For an Indian company the route to Europe is the biosimilar one, with EMA's heparin-specific guideline as the standard.
Sources: Inhixa summary of product characteristics (EMA) and Lovenox US prescribing information (FDA); EMA guideline on non-clinical and clinical development of similar biological medicinal products containing low-molecular-weight heparins.
Approvals by year
Regulatory register
| Regulator | Brand | Holder or applicant | Approved | Application or permission | US licence | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMA | Thorinane | Pharmathen S.A. | Sep 2016 | EMEA/H/C/003795 | Withdrawn | S017 | |
| EMA | Inhixa | Techdow Pharma Netherlands B.V. | Sep 2016 | EMEA/H/C/004264 | Approved | S017 | |
| HC | Noromby | Juno Pharma Canada INC. | Oct 2020 | DIN 02506459, 02506467, 02506475, 02506483, 02506491, 02506505, 02506513 | Approved | S022 | |
| HC | Inclunox | Sandoz Canada Incorporated | Nov 2020 | DIN 02507501, 02507528, 02507536, 02507544, 02507552, 02507560, 02507579 | Approved | S022 | |
| HC | Redesca | Shenzhen Techdow Pharmaceutical CO., LTD. | Dec 2020 | DIN 02509075, 02509083, 02509091, 02509105, 02509113, 02509121, 02509148, 02509156 | Approved | S022 | |
| HC | Elonox | Fresenius Kabi Canada LTD | Oct 2022 | DIN 02532247, 02532255, 02532263, 02532271, 02532298, 02532301, 02532328 | Approved | S022 | |
| HC | Axberi | Baxter Corporation | Jul 2023 | DIN 02539977, 02539985, 02540002, 02540010, 02540045, 02540029, 02540037 | Approved | S022 | |
| EDE | Inhixa | SciencePharma Sp. z o.o., Poland (for Techdow) | Jun 2019 | not published | Registered | S018 | |
| EDE | Ledraxen | Centre Specialites Pharmaceutiques, France | Oct 2021 | not published | Registered | S018 |
CDSCO lists permissions by firm and INN, not brand. PMDA's list and the UAE directory do not publish application numbers; Canadian dates are the first approval or market date recorded in the Drug Product Database.
Regulatory pathway by market
Requirements for an enoxaparin sodium biosimilar under the guidance in force in September 2026.
| FDA, United States | EMA, European Union | PMDA, Japan | Health Canada | CDSCO, India | EDE, UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legal pathway | Not available: enoxaparin is a low-molecular-weight heparin regulated as a drug in the United States; generics are approved by ANDA, the first in 2010 | Article 10(4) of Directive 2001/83/EC; centralised procedure is mandatory for biotechnology products | MHLW approval on PMDA review under the Guideline for Ensuring Quality, Safety and Efficacy of Biosimilars (2009, revised 2020), with Q&A updates in 2024 and 2026 | Notice of Compliance under the Food and Drug Regulations as a biosimilar biologic drug, assessed under Health Canada's guidance on biosimilars (2016, revised 2022 and 2026) | Guidelines on Similar Biologics (CDSCO and DBT, 2016, in force); revised draft published May 2025 | Registration through the Emirates Drug Establishment; the public directory does not distinguish biosimilars from other biologicals |
| Reference product | US-licensed reference; a non-US comparator may be used with analytical and PK bridging | EU-authorised reference; a non-EEA comparator may be used with bridging data | The original biopharmaceutical approved in Japan; foreign-sourced reference accepted with bridging since the 2020 revision | Reference biologic drug authorised in Canada, or a non-Canadian version of it with bridging data | Product licensed in India, or if not, one licensed in an ICH country, with justification | Not stated in the public directory; registration relies on assessment by reference regulators |
| Comparative clinical study | Not applicable; ANDA generics demonstrated sameness by five criteria set by FDA in 2010, without clinical trials | Reflection paper adopted March 2026: a comparative efficacy trial can be waived when analytical and PK comparability is sufficient | Comparative PK study and, in principle, a comparative efficacy study; the May 2026 early consideration sets out when the efficacy study can be omitted, and Japanese patient data are no longer required in every case (2025) | Comparative structural and functional studies, PK and, where warranted, PD equivalence; the 2026 revision reduces the expectation of comparative efficacy trials in line with FDA and EMA | Comparative PK/PD study and a comparative safety and efficacy study are generally expected, followed by a post-marketing study | Assessed on the dossier accepted by the reference regulator |
| Interchangeability | Not applicable; an ANDA generic is substitutable as a drug | EMA and HMA statement (September 2022): EU biosimilars are interchangeable with their reference; substitution rules are set by each member state | Not defined; prescribing by brand, with pharmacist substitution not automatic | No federal designation; substitution and mandatory switching policies are set by each province, several of which have required switching since 2019 | Not defined in the guidelines | Not defined |
| Naming | Enoxaparin sodium, as a drug, without a biologic suffix | INN, identical to the reference; brand name and batch recorded for pharmacovigilance | INN followed by BS (biosimilar), strength, form and the company name in quotation marks, with a biosimilar number in the non-proprietary name | Non-proprietary name identical to the reference, with brand name and DIN as identifiers | INN with the brand name | Brand name as registered |
Sources: FDA draft guidance on comparative efficacy studies (October 2025) and interchangeability (June 2024); EMA reflection paper EMA/CHMP/BMWP/60916/2025 (March 2026) and EMA/HMA statement on interchangeability (September 2022); CDSCO Guidelines on Similar Biologics 2016 and 2025 draft (S009, S010); EDE directory (S018); MHLW/PMDA biosimilar guideline and notifications (S021); Health Canada guidance on biosimilar biologic drugs.
EvySaif prepares the comparative evidence plan and the regional dossier strategy for enoxaparin sodium programmes. Regulatory strategy consulting
Presentations and concentration
Pre-filled syringes of 2,000 IU (20 mg) in 0.2 mL to 15,000 IU (150 mg) in 1 mL, at 100 mg/mL; 12,000 IU/0.8 mL and 15,000 IU/mL are the higher-strength treatment presentations.
| Product | FDA | EMA | PMDA | HC | CDSCO | EDE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inhixa | · | see SmPC | · | 100, 30, 300, 40, 60, 80 mg; 120, 150 mg | · | 2,000 IU/0.2 mL to 15,000 IU/mL PFS |
| Thorinane | · | see SmPC | · | · | · | · |
| Ledraxen | · | · | · | · | · | 2,000 IU/0.2 mL to 8,000 IU/0.8 mL PFS |
| Noromby | · | · | · | 100, 30, 40, 60, 80 mg; 120, 150 mg | · | · |
| Inclunox | · | · | · | 100, 30, 40, 60, 80 mg; 120, 150 mg | · | · |
| Elonox | · | · | · | 100, 30, 40, 60, 80 mg; 120, 150 mg | · | · |
| Axberi | · | · | · | 100, 30, 40, 60, 80 mg; 120, 150 mg | · | · |
Sources: Purple Book (S016), PMDA list (S020), Health Canada Drug Product Database (S022), CDSCO permission lists (S011 to S014), EDE directory (S018). EU presentations are listed in each product's SmPC.
Developers by market
| Developer | Product | FDA | EMA | PMDA | HC | CDSCO | EDE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Techdow (Shenzhen Techdow Pharmaceutical) | Inhixa | · | ✓ | · | ✓ | · | ✓ |
| Pharmathen | Thorinane | · | withdrawn | · | · | · | · |
| Not stated in the EDE directory | Ledraxen | · | · | · | · | · | ✓ |
| Juno Pharma Canada | Noromby | · | · | · | ✓ | · | · |
| Sandoz | Inclunox | · | · | · | ✓ | · | · |
| Fresenius Kabi | Elonox | · | · | · | ✓ | · | · |
| Baxter | Axberi | · | · | · | ✓ | · | · |
Entering a market where a competitor is already listed changes the evidence and pricing conversation. EvySaif's global value dossier and HTA submission work covers that side.
Products
Inhixa
Thorinane
Ledraxen
Noromby
Inclunox
Elonox
Axberi
Questions
Is there an enoxaparin biosimilar in the United States?
No. Enoxaparin is regulated as a drug in the United States, so follow-on products are generics approved by ANDA, the first from Sandoz in July 2010, and none is a 351(k) biosimilar.
Which enoxaparin biosimilars are authorised in the European Union?
One active: Inhixa from Techdow, authorised on 15 September 2016. Thorinane from Pharmathen was authorised the day before and its authorisation lapsed in September 2019.
Is there an enoxaparin biosimilar approved in India?
Enoxaparin is licensed in India under the general drug rules rather than as an r-DNA biological, so it does not appear in CDSCO's published r-DNA lists; several Indian manufacturers market it as a generic.
Which enoxaparin biosimilars are registered in the UAE?
Inhixa, in seven strengths (June 2019), and Ledraxen, in four strengths (October 2021), alongside Clexane.
Why does the EU treat enoxaparin as a biosimilar when the US treats it as a generic?
EU law classes heparins as biological medicines because they are extracted from animal tissue and cannot be fully characterised by physicochemical means, so follow-on versions use the biosimilar route; US law classes them as drugs and FDA accepted a set of five analytical and biological criteria for generic equivalence in 2010.
What comparative evidence does EMA expect for enoxaparin?
Analytical characterisation of the polysaccharide chains and their disaccharide building blocks, pharmacodynamic equivalence of anti-Xa and anti-IIa activity and other markers in healthy volunteers, and an immunogenicity assessment for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; a comparative clinical efficacy study has not been required.
Work with EvySaif on enoxaparin sodium
Enoxaparin sodium biosimilar landscape report
The register on this page as a delivered document: every approval, holder, presentation and pathway requirement across FDA, EMA, CDSCO and the Gulf, updated to the month, with the sources attached.
Request the landscape reportRegulatory gap assessment
For a developer deciding whether and where to file: a review of your analytical, PK and clinical package against what each regulator expects for enoxaparin sodium, with the gaps ranked and a filing sequence recommended.
About the gap assessmentSources
S017EMA, medicines data table (medicines-output-medicines-report_en.xlsx) Primary (regulator)S018UAE Emirates Drug Establishment, registered medical product directory Primary (regulator)S022Health Canada, Drug Product Database data extract (active and inactive product files, biosimilar table) Primary (regulator)S009CDSCO and DBT, Guidelines on Similar Biologics 2016 Primary (regulator)S010CDSCO, Draft Guidelines on Similar Biologics 2025 Primary (regulator)
Planning enoxaparin sodium biosimilar development?
EvySaif can help assess your regulatory pathway, clinical evidence requirements and market-entry strategy across India, UAE and other target markets.
Talk to a biosimilar regulatory consultant